Announcing C1 Transform 2026

C1 vs. RunLayer

Everything RunLayer does at the MCP layer — plus the identity and lifecycle controls it can't.

RunLayer locks down MCP tool calls. C1 does that and governs who gets access to those tools, what they're allowed to do, and when access ends.

Ask AI to write a summary of this post

See how C1 compares to RunLayer

C1
RunLayer
MCP tool-level permissions
Policy engine scopes every MCP tool call — allow, deny, or require approval per tool, per agent, per user.
Core strength: tool-level allow/deny rules for MCP calls.
Runtime call monitoring & logging
Every tool call logged with full identity context — who triggered it, which agent, which credential, what policy applied.
Tool call logging with session-level context.
Policy enforcement on agent actions
Real-time policy evaluation: block, allow, or route to approval based on agent identity, tool sensitivity, and context.
Rule-based enforcement at the MCP gateway.
Credential injection for tool calls
Native credential vault with auto-rotation and instant revocation — no external dependency.
1Password partnership for credential injection.
Approval workflows for sensitive tools
Self-service requests with policy-based auto-approval. Escalation paths, time-bound grants, Slack/Teams integration.
Not available — permissions are static.
Agent identity & ownership
First-class agent identities: credentials, policies, lifecycle states, assigned owners. Agents are treated like employees.
Runtime monitoring of agent actions; no persistent agent identity.
Access certifications for AI tools
Automated periodic reviews: "Should this agent still have access to this MCP server?" Same workflow as SaaS app reviews.
Not available.
JIT (just-in-time) access
Time-boxed access grants that auto-expire. An agent gets production MCP access for 2 hours, then it's gone.
Not available — access is persistent until manually removed.
Provisioning & deprovisioning
Full joiner-mover-leaver lifecycle. Onboard an agent, move it between teams, offboard it — access follows automatically.
No lifecycle management; relies on Okta/Entra for identity.
MCP catalog & pass-through
Thousands of MCPs ready to connect, plus pass-through support for any MCP server.
MCP-connected tools only — bring your own servers.
Credential execution modes
Run tools as a service account (one license, shared across agents) or pass through individual user credentials — match the mode to the use case and save on per-seat costs.
1Password partnership for credential injection; no service account mode.
Scope beyond MCP
Governs AI tools, MCP servers, and all enterprise apps (GitHub, Salesforce, AWS, etc.) in one platform.
MCP-connected tools only.

Top 5 reasons leaders choose C1 over RunLayer

Time to value

The biggest ROI we have seen is in time. We have communicated to leadership and management our estimates and I'm very confident that the tool pays for itself.

Roberto Mateo

Roberto Mateo, VP of It Business Operations

Full visibility and control

A huge win for me is the overall visibility. I don't have to log into ten different places to figure out who has access to what – I can just go to C1.

Paul Yoo

Paul Yoo, Head of Security Platform

Simple, intuitive design

One day you requested AWS access through IT tickets. The next day you didn't. We didn't have to roll it out in stages — just a clean cutover.

Stephen Darling

Stephen Darling, Staff Infrastructure Engineer

Committed to innovation

None of the other options in the market were simple for us. C1 was incredibly inquisitive, collaborative, iterative, and innovative.

Tim Lisko

Tim Lisko, Director of Product and Infrastructure Security

Real security impact

We've appreciably improved our security posture without spending a bunch of time and money, which is a huge benefit for our customers.

Matthew Sullivan

Matthew Sullivan, Infrastructure Security Team Leader